This is part four of a four-part series on Star Wars. If you have been reading so far, you know that on the whole, I have been extremely impressed with the Special Edition DVDs that were released today. But what of Star Wars itself? And what of its oft-villified godhead, George Lucas?

The Empire of Dreams documentary that comprises the bulk of the fouth disc in the trilogy DVD package really confrims what I've thought about Lucas for the last few years and, by proxy, about filmmaking in general. Namely, that auteur theory is flawed fallacy, that film is the most collabrative of all media, that the contributions of people like Ben Burtt, John Williams, John Dykstra, Ralph Mcquirrie, Frank Oz, Mark Hamill, Irwin Kirshner, and Leia Bracket are just as important as Lucas' guiding hand, and, further, that the greatness of Star Wars is inversely proportional to Lucas's creative control over it.

But I'm through crying about the Special Edition changes or how the ineptly made the prequels are. Seeing the original movies (well, mostly original) again in spectacular clarity was "quite enough to get me excited," to borrow a phrase. And that Episode III lightsaber duel footage got my fanboy heart beating. (Best of all, no lava surfboard in sight.)

And that Empire of Dreams documentary also really encapsulated a lot of why Star Wars is exciting to the film geek, not just the sci-fi geek. Namely, that it is the ultimate guerilla movie. Given the struggle to make it, the fact that it exsits at all is a testament to the power of dogged creativity. That it exists in as wonderful form as it does is a testament to the ability of experimental, independent filmmakers to produce quality that cannot be matched by the studios. And the fact that it is among the most popular of all phenomon is a testament to the commonality of the creative impulse in each of us.

And all that is because of one man. A man for whom I can no longer espouse hatred. A man I once admired so greatly I wanted to pattern my life after his and, whom, I still think deserves tremendous respect. A man who dissapointed me, yes, but a man with whom I have made my own peace: George Lucas.

Watching the Empire of Dreams documentary is obviously very complimentary of the young George Lucas and his passionate belief in his fantasy project. And I think the admiration for that Lucas has never left even the most ardent of bashers. (Indeed, you would be hard-pressed to find a basher more ardent than myself.)

But over the last few years, I have come to see the modern Lucas as out-of-touch and washed-up, a fool who didn't "get" his own creation. A favourite analogy of mine was comparing Lucas to Vader -- both good men corrupted to the Dark Side. I've liked Lucas' tightening grasp over Star Wars to the Emperors' over the galaxy. I like to paraphrase Leia in A New Hope: "The tighter your grasp, the more fans will slip though your fingers." How could Lucas not understand that what he has become, I have wondered -- how could he not understand that he now embodies the opposite of what Star Wars is about?

Well, the most eye-opening part of Empire of Dreams is where Lucas admits to doing just that. And though he does not dwell on it, he seems conflicted -- overcome with the kind of peacful disappointment that you get when you look back on who you were when you were young and contrast that with who you are now. In other words, Lucas is human. He grows and grows old. He is and is not the man he once was. And I can't hold that against him, certainly not in the name of some foolish consistency.

But my ultimate peace with Lucas and my hope for Star Wars comes from this interview.

The peace comes from this line from Lucas, directed to fans like me who have been upset by changes to the original three films:

"I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it."

An apology and an empathic display. And a firm statement of his own opinion. If Lucas understands how we feel about this -- that we honestly, genuinely fell in love with those movies and that that's why they are so dear to us -- well, then we can understand how he feels -- that those movies really were incomplete to him. What more can either of us ask?

That doesn't mean, of course, that I suddenly agree that Greedo should fire first or that Episode II is really well-written or something. I will continue to be critical of his work and his changes, but I certainly will not claim that he doesn't have a right to do what he's doing. Nor will I allow my displeasure with certain things to offset the wonder and joy that Star Wars has always provided me. Call it a truce.

Given what I have been saying about Star Wars being best when Lucas is involved the least, and hoping that he would step aside to let new voices play in this sandbox that we love so much, the hope I have for the future comes from this quote:

Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it...If I get the right people involved, it could be interesting.

A few weeks ago, J. Michael Straczynski started to make cryptic comments about a potentially huge new sci-fi TV project. Even if these dots don't connect, just imagine the possibilities.