31 July 2004

Movies: The Village

M. Night Shyamalan is the master of suspense and he knows it. "All the decisions are made in honor of the god of tension," he is quoted as saying in a recent Newsweek article. "Raising the tension over and over and never letting you up." Indeed, Shyamalan is the anti-Speilberg when it comes to language of cinema: Night knows what you expect and delivers the opposite. "Where you would normally cut, I don't cut so now you're not sure of the rhythm of the movie, which makes you feel uneasy. Or the camera is moving just six inches over the course of three minutes-- you're not sure why because you're not aware, but you're feeling more tense."

Unfortunately, when it comes to The Village, he also knows exactly what you expect and delivers, well, exactly what you expect-- the shocking, mind-blowing twist that has become Shamalyan's calling card. And his crutch. After all, just how shocking can a twist be when you know one's coming from the moment you read Written, produced, and directed by M. Night Shyamalan?

True to form, Shyamalan twists and re-twists his audience like a Mobius strip. Trouble is, each twist is more anticlimactic than the one the one that came before. The mind is baffled rather than blown.

The Sixth Sense was so effective because then-unknown Shyamalan blindsided his audience with the twist. The twists in both Signs and Unbreakable were organic to the plots. The Village reads like Shyamalan came up with the twist first and the movie second.

At this point, Shyamalan's taken his own style of writing as far as it can go. Next time he should have the courage to film a script written by someone else in order to spotlight his true talent: directing.

Moreso than any other American filmmaker, Shyamalan knows how to play with our expectations of cinema. Here's hoping that he learns how to play with our expectations of him.

* *

3 Comments so far

  1. Ray July 31st, 2004 7:01 am

    Maybe I've just seen too many episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation, but did anyone else think all the twists were toally spelled out the premise of "In an unspecified time, the youth of a quaint, seemingly idyllic village are filled with fear by a group of elders who tell tales of the danger of the outside world"?

  2. Ray July 31st, 2004 7:11 am

    Speaking of being unable to break out of one's own style, this review reads almost exactly like this one.

  3. Ray August 1st, 2004 11:20 pm

    I have been told by some of you that you liked the film and that I am pretentious for not liking it. Listen: I'm not alone; The film has scored a rather abysmal 45% on the Tomatometer and even the gushingly positive reviews admit the twists are obvious. Meanwhile, Sham has issued an edict that no one in the press reveal the twists-- as if he is himself admitting as Roger Ebert wrote "that is not because we would spoil the movie for you. It's because if you knew them, you wouldn't want to go. "

    If you liked this movie, I'd love to hear you explain why.

Leave a comment